Mobile product design · May 2024 to present

Dining, with a human touch.

I redesigned LUJO's dining journey around premium discovery, meaningful filters, confident venue decisions and concierge support.

Role
Sole product designer
Scope
Research references, flows, UI and handoff
Team
CEO, developers and QA testers
Status
Direction released publicly on iOS
LUJO Dining public iOS interface

The challenge

Luxury cannot feel like a long list.

The inherited experience looked dated and offered little help when members needed to narrow restaurant choices.

Dining intent is contextual. Cuisine, location, date, time, atmosphere and group needs all shape the decision. Yet the earlier experience had no meaningful filtering system and limited support for comparing a venue before requesting service.

Discover

Make exploration feel curated instead of overwhelming.

Decide

Provide useful controls without turning refinement into work.

Assist

Keep human concierge support visible when technology cannot complete the journey alone.

Process evidence

A redesign, not a reskin.

The supplied Figma file preserves explicit OLD and New Design areas. It records the scale of the work: a new discovery hierarchy, filter suite, details experience and request states.

Figma overview comparing inherited and redesigned LUJO Dining screens
Inherited and redesigned flowsEvidence from the supplied working Figma file

My contribution

From CEO direction to build review.

As sole product designer, I translated stakeholder direction into flows, high-fidelity screens, prototypes and reusable patterns.

I reviewed competitor apps and captured interface references to clarify patterns and stakeholder expectations. I iterated extensively in Figma, prepared handoff and worked with developers as the designs met real implementation constraints.

Direction

Convert CEO requirements and reference apps into a coherent product direction.

Design

Rework navigation, hierarchy, filters, venue details and request states.

Delivery

Support developer handoff, review implementation and prioritise usability when parity was limited.

Validation

Formal testing was completed by QA testers. I used their findings with stakeholder and developer feedback to refine the experience.

This case study does not claim formal generative user research. It distinguishes competitor-reference work, stakeholder input and QA validation clearly.

Design principles

Taste, clarity and a confident next step.

Four rules helped the redesign remain useful while the visual direction became more premium.

Curate

Inspire before showing everything.

Lead with editorial imagery and meaningful groupings, then provide depth as intent becomes specific.

Reduce

Preferences should remove effort.

Filters shorten a decision through clear language, visible selections and predictable apply or reset actions.

Assist

Human service stays inside the journey.

A structured concierge request should feel like a deliberate continuation, not a digital dead end.

Key solution

Filtering became a product tool.

The redesign introduced refinements for dining preferences, cuisine, date and time. Visible selections help members understand the result set and remain in control.

Venue decision

Enough detail to choose with confidence.

The venue experience organises editorial and practical information into About, Experience, Menu and Reviews.

Price, opening hours, map context and a clear service action remain available without competing with the character of the venue.

Expanded LUJO venue detail design
Progressive venue detailEditorial context and practical information in one decision flow

Concierge handoff

A structured bridge to human support.

Restaurant, location, date, time, guest count, cuisine and special requirements become one readable request. New, chat and assigned states make the service handoff easier to follow.

Figma to release

The direction reached iOS. Details kept evolving.

The public listing reflects the dark, image-led dining direction and visibly includes search, refinement, content cards, category pills and mobile navigation.

Continuity

Luxury palette, editorial imagery, Dining identity, search and filter affordances are visible publicly.

Constraint

Some Figma details changed because of implementation limitations. I documented gaps and prioritised usability.

Boundary

The listing cannot prove complete interaction parity, accessibility states or detailed request behaviour.

Public LUJO App Store Dining screens
Public iOS listingVisible release direction, not a claim of full Figma parity

Outcome

A more useful dining direction, with claims kept honest.

01

CEO-approved product direction.

02

First meaningful structured filtering experience.

03

Formal product testing completed by QA testers.

04

Design direction available publicly on iOS.

No conversion, satisfaction, retention or efficiency improvements are claimed because validated analytics were not available for this case study.

Reflection

Luxury is the confidence of knowing the next step.

This project reinforced that premium product design is not visual styling alone. It reduces uncertainty and makes the transition between self-service and human assistance feel coherent.

Next project